Hello? Anyone home?
Crimeny, it's been *years* since anyone posted here.
BTW, I declared at a party on Labor Day 2015 that I would vote for Donald Fucking Trump before I would vote for Hillary.
:sigh: I guess now I get my chance.
Sunday, November 6, 2016
Saturday, July 6, 2013
Instapundit on a rant
Glenn had to get something off his chest.
As we say here....Fuck.
http://pjmedia.com/instapundit/171982/
As we say here....Fuck.
http://pjmedia.com/instapundit/171982/
Thursday, September 20, 2012
Sunday, August 5, 2012
Sunday, October 23, 2011
Saturday, July 16, 2011
Wednesday, May 11, 2011
Wednesday, April 6, 2011
Chris Matthews Performs His Own Version Of "Jizz In My Pants"
His eyes look at the TV screen
That lets me make up what that means.
His baritone voice echos, "yes we can"
And I'm one of the few that understands.
I'm transported onto his Greek stage
The colors in my head are in a rage.
He looks at me without me needing to beg
He says my name and tingles shoot down my leg
and I
Jizz in my pants
This would never of happened to Olbermann.
What set if off was the crease in his slacks
Next time we talk I'll be sure to first jack.
And now I
Jizz in my pants
Don't say anything, I want this to be my lede.
It's attention like this is what I need.
With my ratings, I'll take what I can get.
Now I’ll go to my room and change
I need a few things for a story clip
Editing video, looking for a place to snip.
Another speech of yours appeared on screen
The warm feeling flushed and I screamed.
This isn't like me when I worked for Carter
His sweater vest never made me hotter
Something about your baritone voice
Makes my boy parts go all moist.
And I
Jizzed in my pants
It’s perfectly normal, nothing wrong with me
I'm going to need a clean up in the NBC lobby
And now I’m posed in an awkward stance because I
Jizzed in my pants
To be fair you were talking a lot
Plus your delivery got me bothered and hot
Please stop acting like you’re not impressed
All your speeches are on my iPod
Ready to watch when I want to shoot my wad
I wonder if the same thing happens to Maddow
And I
Jizzed in my pants
Last week – I saw the crease
In your pants that David Brooks told me about
I was hoping to touch the hem of your pants leg
When I
Jizzed in my pants
At the National Press Club Dinner,
I was invited to attend.
I saw the Secret Service usher you in
and I
Jizz in my pants
Mika Brzezinski said something about you and I
Jizz in my pants
Passed operational control over to NATO and I
Jizz in my pants
When you bow to foreign dignitaries I
Jizzed in my pants
ObamaCare was passed and I...
Jizzed… in… my pants
Jizzed… in… my pants
Ok seriously you guys can we… ok…
I jizz right in my pants every time you’re next to me
And when you're on TV it’s like having sex with me
You say I’m premature I just call it ecstasy
I wear a rubber on 'Hardball' now, it’s a necessity
Cuz I
Jizz… in… my pants
(I jizz in my pants, I jizz in my pants
Yes I jizz in my pants, yes I jizz in my pants)
Yes I jizz… in… my pants
(I jizz in my pants, I jizz in my pants)
That lets me make up what that means.
His baritone voice echos, "yes we can"
And I'm one of the few that understands.
I'm transported onto his Greek stage
The colors in my head are in a rage.
He looks at me without me needing to beg
He says my name and tingles shoot down my leg
and I
Jizz in my pants
This would never of happened to Olbermann.
What set if off was the crease in his slacks
Next time we talk I'll be sure to first jack.
And now I
Jizz in my pants
Don't say anything, I want this to be my lede.
It's attention like this is what I need.
With my ratings, I'll take what I can get.
Now I’ll go to my room and change
I need a few things for a story clip
Editing video, looking for a place to snip.
Another speech of yours appeared on screen
The warm feeling flushed and I screamed.
This isn't like me when I worked for Carter
His sweater vest never made me hotter
Something about your baritone voice
Makes my boy parts go all moist.
And I
Jizzed in my pants
It’s perfectly normal, nothing wrong with me
I'm going to need a clean up in the NBC lobby
And now I’m posed in an awkward stance because I
Jizzed in my pants
To be fair you were talking a lot
Plus your delivery got me bothered and hot
Please stop acting like you’re not impressed
All your speeches are on my iPod
Ready to watch when I want to shoot my wad
I wonder if the same thing happens to Maddow
And I
Jizzed in my pants
Last week – I saw the crease
In your pants that David Brooks told me about
I was hoping to touch the hem of your pants leg
When I
Jizzed in my pants
At the National Press Club Dinner,
I was invited to attend.
I saw the Secret Service usher you in
and I
Jizz in my pants
Mika Brzezinski said something about you and I
Jizz in my pants
Passed operational control over to NATO and I
Jizz in my pants
When you bow to foreign dignitaries I
Jizzed in my pants
ObamaCare was passed and I...
Jizzed… in… my pants
Jizzed… in… my pants
Ok seriously you guys can we… ok…
I jizz right in my pants every time you’re next to me
And when you're on TV it’s like having sex with me
You say I’m premature I just call it ecstasy
I wear a rubber on 'Hardball' now, it’s a necessity
Cuz I
Jizz… in… my pants
(I jizz in my pants, I jizz in my pants
Yes I jizz in my pants, yes I jizz in my pants)
Yes I jizz… in… my pants
(I jizz in my pants, I jizz in my pants)
Friday, March 25, 2011
Tuesday, November 9, 2010
Missing Missile Missive
by Smitty
The left coast missile surprise has dominated the news of the day.
We can now reveal the truth. That wasn't just any missile; it was a King Missile:
The left coast missile surprise has dominated the news of the day.
We can now reveal the truth. That wasn't just any missile; it was a King Missile:
Wednesday, October 13, 2010
What Does Dick Blumenthal And The Pedophile From The Movie, Happiness Have In Common?
Other than they look like they could have been separated at birth?
First, here's Dick:
Contrast with the pedophile from the movie, Happiness.
The physical similarity between the two men is eerie.
Except Blumenthal is edging out in front with the creepiness factor.
First, here's Dick:
Contrast with the pedophile from the movie, Happiness.
WARNING: You may need to wash your soul after viewing this clip. It's disturbing.
The physical similarity between the two men is eerie.
Except Blumenthal is edging out in front with the creepiness factor.
Friday, October 8, 2010
Obama’s “Hope-A-Dope” Nation
With two years left in his term, the errand boy sent by grocery clerks presides over a nation in deep and ever-growing trouble.
Through his propaganda of carefully crafted, semi-divine, yet vague and appealing buzzwords, Fearless Reader won the public's support. Now, his cult is crumbling.
Washington seeks to extend our dependence on government in perpetuity. A record forty-two million Americans are on food stamps. That's an 18% jump from 2009 and 1.4% from June 2010.
Political scientist William Voegeli's new book, "Never Enough: America's Limitless Welfare State" notes, "Liberals don't want the government to grow indefinitely. They just want it to be bigger than it is right now."
We are seeing, firsthand, that big government’s trillion-dollar stimulus programs don’t produce jobs.
The Democrats' stimulus includes "$145 billion in state and local aid to forestall austerity measures in the public sector," notes Manhattan Institute senior fellow E.J. McMahon. As private sector workers suffer layoffs, salary cuts and pay freezes, the stimulus gives raises to government employees—who increasingly dominate Big Labor, which returns the favor with cash for Democrats.
"I have no better friend in labor than AFSCME," House Speaker Nancy Pelosi once said of the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, the U.S.' largest political campaign donor, giving over $38 million since 1990, almost all to Democrats.
The gelding who occupies the Oval Office infused federal aid to states and localities pumping up the paychecks of heavily unionized public employees who already earn more, on average, than the people who pay their salaries.
Finally, lower cost was the campaign promise of ObamaCare, but as Medicare actuaries confirmed, it will increase healthcare costs. The president's government takeover has already begun to boost private health insurance premiums and all we’ve seen to date is the tip of the iceberg. Still more frightening—there are two more years left in this president-in-training’s term.
May God have mercy on this nation.
Labels:
Barack Obama,
big government,
big labor,
economic stimulus,
food stamps,
ObamaCare
Thursday, October 7, 2010
BREAKING: 89,000 Bogus Stimulus Checks Sent To Jailbait And Dead People
The Social Security Administration, the agency was charged with distributing one-time payments, sent about 89,000 bogus stimulus checks of $250 each to dead and jailed people according to a new inspector-general’s report.
The report said that of these payments, about 55,000, were sent because the recipients had died recently, and the Social Security Administration had not been informed of their deaths by states, families or funeral homes at the time the payments were sent. The remaining 17,000 of the mistaken payments were attributed to the Social Security Administration failing to properly process death records that it did have. The combined total of the bogus payments totals an astounding $22.3 million.
The Social Security Administration says that the stimulus package didn’t include a provision allowing it to try to retrieve funds that were mistakenly sent out, so it can’t try to retrieve the money. Are you fucking kidding me?
A long-time campaigner against waste, Sen. Tom Coburn (R-OK) said, “This report highlights the broader problems with the Recovery Act itself. At a time like now, when nearly $350 billion in waste, fraud and abuse in the federal government annually has been reported and our national debt closing in on $13.5 trillion, these findings represent the epitome of congressional stupidity and a total disregard for accountability.”
Originally posted at No Sheeples Here.
Sunday, September 26, 2010
To Ron Radosh at PJM, who's lackey isn't doing his job
His piece is here:
http://pajamasmedia.com/ronradosh/2010/09/23/why-republicans-will-not-win-the-senate/
A taste:
My comment, and now response (since whoever there moderates comments couldn't be bothered) here at this august blog:
The center-right has been successfully demonized as being “radical” and “far-right” so long now that people, like you Ron, take it as conventional wisdom, which is definitely conventional, but rarely wise.
We need to redefine what “centrist” actually means. I believe it is not merely someone who sits in the middle between left and center-right, as that implies a center-left mindset – and that satisfies no-one. Not the 20% self-described “liberal” and definitely not the 42% of the electorate who claim “conservative”. Even the 35% who currently claim “moderate”, when push comes to shove, will abandon that and go one way or the other. And that will almost invariably end up with a majority of “conservatives” in the electorate. So someone tell me why we should have a party that panders to that middle group and leaves the larger “base” unfulfilled instead of embracing the base and reaching out to the “moderates” and convincing them that their agenda most meets their needs? After all, the moderates are the ones that need convincing and they put themselves there to be convinced. Besides, do you really think a “centrist” party is going to peel off any part of the 20% of “liberals”? When a self-identified group gets near those numbers, it’s the hard-core true-believers. they can’t BE convinced to vote for you.
In essence, Ron, you’re advocating the same policies the GOP has run for nearly ever – chase the “moderates” by being “centrist” and throw a couple bones to the conservatives but generally ignore them as they will always be there. Which was what Bush and the Republican leadership have done since Gingrich was ousted, and continue to try to do this year with neglect and active hostility towards conservative challengers in Florida, Delaware, and Alaska. Basically, be “Democrat-lite” and manage the disaster that liberalism is creating instead of actually averting it. What did that get them in 2006 and 2008?
Oh, yeah, the people will vote for the actual Democrat or Republican rather than the pale imitation.
Let's give the people an actual party for which to vote.
http://pajamasmedia.com/ronradosh/2010/09/23/why-republicans-will-not-win-the-senate/
A taste:
Now consider today’s Republican Party. At a moment when it is poised to present meaningful conservative alternatives to the stale bromides of a bankrupt liberalism, far right activists who demand ideological purity and rigidity on all issues dominate the activist base, and seemingly are succeeding in producing a conservatism that is both not electable and far removed from appealing to the disappointments that are driving so many away from the Democratic Party.
My comment, and now response (since whoever there moderates comments couldn't be bothered) here at this august blog:
The center-right has been successfully demonized as being “radical” and “far-right” so long now that people, like you Ron, take it as conventional wisdom, which is definitely conventional, but rarely wise.
We need to redefine what “centrist” actually means. I believe it is not merely someone who sits in the middle between left and center-right, as that implies a center-left mindset – and that satisfies no-one. Not the 20% self-described “liberal” and definitely not the 42% of the electorate who claim “conservative”. Even the 35% who currently claim “moderate”, when push comes to shove, will abandon that and go one way or the other. And that will almost invariably end up with a majority of “conservatives” in the electorate. So someone tell me why we should have a party that panders to that middle group and leaves the larger “base” unfulfilled instead of embracing the base and reaching out to the “moderates” and convincing them that their agenda most meets their needs? After all, the moderates are the ones that need convincing and they put themselves there to be convinced. Besides, do you really think a “centrist” party is going to peel off any part of the 20% of “liberals”? When a self-identified group gets near those numbers, it’s the hard-core true-believers. they can’t BE convinced to vote for you.
In essence, Ron, you’re advocating the same policies the GOP has run for nearly ever – chase the “moderates” by being “centrist” and throw a couple bones to the conservatives but generally ignore them as they will always be there. Which was what Bush and the Republican leadership have done since Gingrich was ousted, and continue to try to do this year with neglect and active hostility towards conservative challengers in Florida, Delaware, and Alaska. Basically, be “Democrat-lite” and manage the disaster that liberalism is creating instead of actually averting it. What did that get them in 2006 and 2008?
Oh, yeah, the people will vote for the actual Democrat or Republican rather than the pale imitation.
Let's give the people an actual party for which to vote.
Saturday, September 25, 2010
Amy Schumer Advertises Herself Out To Be An Easy Date
Thanks to Da Tech Guy by way of the Hot Air quotes for the day.
At about the 3:58 mark, Amy Schumer lets it slip that she's had sex with about a "Baker's two dozen". So about 26 guys for a woman who isn't in her thirties yet. Out of everything she said, that could have been the worse thing that came out of her mouth. During that clip, obviously.
What irks me is how she feels it's somehow incumbent upon herself to attack Crowder's position about abstinence. Because she's been around the block more than a few times somehow makes her more wise than Crowder. She assumes that Crowder is the naive virgin with rose colored glasses and it's her duty to remove them.
She couldn't even muster up enough self esteem to give him a pat on the back and say, "Good job. Won't work with me because, you know, I'm kind of a gutter trollop myself but if it works for you. . ."
Note to Amy, being flat on your back doesn't make you world-wise. Only world weary.
Anyone else could have traded in their level of fame for some chick who was ready to trot but he hasn't. There's something to be said about the willpower and character of Crowder.
At about the 3:58 mark, Amy Schumer lets it slip that she's had sex with about a "Baker's two dozen". So about 26 guys for a woman who isn't in her thirties yet. Out of everything she said, that could have been the worse thing that came out of her mouth. During that clip, obviously.
What irks me is how she feels it's somehow incumbent upon herself to attack Crowder's position about abstinence. Because she's been around the block more than a few times somehow makes her more wise than Crowder. She assumes that Crowder is the naive virgin with rose colored glasses and it's her duty to remove them.
She couldn't even muster up enough self esteem to give him a pat on the back and say, "Good job. Won't work with me because, you know, I'm kind of a gutter trollop myself but if it works for you. . ."
Note to Amy, being flat on your back doesn't make you world-wise. Only world weary.
Anyone else could have traded in their level of fame for some chick who was ready to trot but he hasn't. There's something to be said about the willpower and character of Crowder.
Wednesday, September 15, 2010
A Visual Representation Of How It Use To Work With Voters And GOP RINOs
The chimp on the left was the RINO. The chimp on the right use to be the voters.
Christine O'Donnell beating noted old guy and RINO Mike Castle was one of the first of many slaps to the hand.
Thanks to BuzzFeed for the photograph.
Christine O'Donnell beating noted old guy and RINO Mike Castle was one of the first of many slaps to the hand.
Thanks to BuzzFeed for the photograph.
Monday, August 16, 2010
Fucking A Right This Belongs Here
Thanks to Carol over at No Sheeples Here for a terrific video. She answers the rather childish video put forward by the 'Fuck Tea' party. . . Or whatever their name is this week. Coffee, cocoa, loose stool, you know, their preferred drink instead of Tea.
I'm not sure but I think this is how a video starts to go viral:
I'm not sure but I think this is how a video starts to go viral:
Welcome Don Surber readers.
Welcome This Ain't Hell readers.
Welcome Little Miss Attila readers.
Welcome Nice Deb readers.
Welcome Doug Ross readers.
Welcome Conservatives4Palin readers.
Welcome IOwnTheWorld readers.
Wednesday, July 14, 2010
Friday, July 2, 2010
Kim Kardashian Cloned*
Or standing with her wax double? It's up to debate which on has had more work done.
*Alternative title was Kim Kardashian Kloned in an effort to make Charles Johnson tilt at hidden windmills.
*Alternative title was Kim Kardashian Kloned in an effort to make Charles Johnson tilt at hidden windmills.
Saturday, June 19, 2010
Moe has it right here
I fucking despise Communism.
And he can't say it at RedState, for obvious reasons. But he sure can say that here!
I agree with him. for all the reasons there are. Historical, economic, individualist. Whatever. There is nothing, in my opinion, that communism has to show for itself, except pain and grief. And dedicated fans in the prosperous West, who don't or won't recognize that they can't have what they have now if they get the regime they want.
Moe and I are roughly the same age with just as roughly similar backgrounds (Union and Democrat parents), we were born in the midst of the Vietnam war and grew up in it's aftermath. We both were taught by teachers who cut their teeth on the "peace" and "antiwar" movements. It WAS the '70s and '80s after all. He got much more of it than I - he went to college and got "a liberal arts major with a degree in English lit and some grad school work in library science". I joined the Navy. We both came out alright. I think he had a harder time of it, though. Much more to wade through.
He makes the point that communist countries can't even feed themselves, and therefore they are by definition illegitimate. This is true. Many of us who are our age and older remember Carter's wheat sales to the USSR, and we wondered then, why do they need our wheat, if they are this huge country pledged to our destruction? Why can't the feed themselves? Why do we need to feed them so they can kill us?
But it's more than that. Communism killed the soul of those it let survive. Everything for the state, no individuality please, thank you. That's why they had cars like the Trabant (and were grateful for it) and not cars like the Syrena Sport.
The West, relatively (and more in some places than others), was a "work hard, play hard" kind of place. And it let you play hard, if that was your wont. Behind the iron curtain, it was "work harder" and all glory was to the state, prole, be happy you are furthering the glorious revolution! Isn't that what you want? To be part of something larger than yourself?
That last sentence is key, I think, to the mindset of those who were caught behind the curtain and those who hold nostalgia today. We ALL want to be part of something larger than ourselves. It gives us meaning and a sense of belonging and purpose. I joined the Navy for that very reason. But I think those that fetishize communism and socialism feel the same way, that they are furthering a cause. That makes them dangerous. They're not doing it for themselves, you see, but for humanity. And nothing, not even human bodies, are too high a price for human perfection.
But Moe, you, and I know that the perfect is the enemy of the good.
MrMaryk out.
And he can't say it at RedState, for obvious reasons. But he sure can say that here!
I agree with him. for all the reasons there are. Historical, economic, individualist. Whatever. There is nothing, in my opinion, that communism has to show for itself, except pain and grief. And dedicated fans in the prosperous West, who don't or won't recognize that they can't have what they have now if they get the regime they want.
Moe and I are roughly the same age with just as roughly similar backgrounds (Union and Democrat parents), we were born in the midst of the Vietnam war and grew up in it's aftermath. We both were taught by teachers who cut their teeth on the "peace" and "antiwar" movements. It WAS the '70s and '80s after all. He got much more of it than I - he went to college and got "a liberal arts major with a degree in English lit and some grad school work in library science". I joined the Navy. We both came out alright. I think he had a harder time of it, though. Much more to wade through.
He makes the point that communist countries can't even feed themselves, and therefore they are by definition illegitimate. This is true. Many of us who are our age and older remember Carter's wheat sales to the USSR, and we wondered then, why do they need our wheat, if they are this huge country pledged to our destruction? Why can't the feed themselves? Why do we need to feed them so they can kill us?
But it's more than that. Communism killed the soul of those it let survive. Everything for the state, no individuality please, thank you. That's why they had cars like the Trabant (and were grateful for it) and not cars like the Syrena Sport.
The West, relatively (and more in some places than others), was a "work hard, play hard" kind of place. And it let you play hard, if that was your wont. Behind the iron curtain, it was "work harder" and all glory was to the state, prole, be happy you are furthering the glorious revolution! Isn't that what you want? To be part of something larger than yourself?
That last sentence is key, I think, to the mindset of those who were caught behind the curtain and those who hold nostalgia today. We ALL want to be part of something larger than ourselves. It gives us meaning and a sense of belonging and purpose. I joined the Navy for that very reason. But I think those that fetishize communism and socialism feel the same way, that they are furthering a cause. That makes them dangerous. They're not doing it for themselves, you see, but for humanity. And nothing, not even human bodies, are too high a price for human perfection.
But Moe, you, and I know that the perfect is the enemy of the good.
MrMaryk out.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)





